<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Sceptical Mind &#187; cuil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scepticalmind.com/tag/cuil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scepticalmind.com</link>
	<description>The ramblings of a Danish sceptic liberal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 16:24:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cuil &#8211; a sad review</title>
		<link>http://www.scepticalmind.com/2008/08/05/cuil-a-sad-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scepticalmind.com/2008/08/05/cuil-a-sad-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lind Mortensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scepticalmind.com/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently tried out the &#8220;new&#8221; search engine Cuil which supposedly was the new up and coming competitor to Google. Now, I really went into this with an open mind and thought: &#8220;Hey, if they claim to be better than Google, they probably have even better features that make my searching and related tasks easier&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 5px; float: left; width: 60%;" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/cuil1.jpg" alt="Cuil - a sad review" />I recently tried out the &#8220;new&#8221; search engine Cuil which supposedly was the new up and coming competitor to Google. Now, I really went into this with an open mind and thought: &#8220;Hey, if they claim to be better than Google, they probably have even better features that make my searching and related tasks easier&#8221; &#8212; well, I was wrong!</p>
<p>Cuil is in many ways a semi-finished project. It doesn&#8217;t have superior searching in any way. It actually didn&#8217;t even have any relevant results half the time I searched for things.. Things that Google did have relevant results for.</p>
<p>One of the other things that make Google special is their many functions. As in you can use commands like <em>define:</em> and <em>site:</em> , and even use Google as a calculator with support for trigonometric functions and currency converter. Cuil has none of these features!</p>
<p>Also, when it comes to Cuil&#8217;s layout, they&#8217;ve said that the picture-paragraph thing is there because users should visit websites based on pictures and not &#8220;meaningless&#8221; text.  While I can partly agree with this, they do a terrible job of actually making this work. The pictures shown are seldom relevant and you have a tendency to choose the results with the pictures &#8211; yet the real information could easily be on a website without a relevant picture. Text is still the single most relevant thing we search for &#8211; it&#8217;s why we use the Internet.. so that we can share information.. and text is information.. images are seldom necessary..</p>
<p>All in all I&#8217;m very disappointed in Cuil and at the moment I don&#8217;t believe for a second that it will even remotely be a competitor to Google&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m definitely sticking to Google for the time being.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scepticalmind.com/2008/08/05/cuil-a-sad-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
